Head-to-head · Independent comparison
How Blueberry Funded and FTMO stack up on profit split, pricing, payouts and the rules that bind a funded account — advertised claims separated from what we could verify.
Clear rules and flexible payouts; verify platform and corporate details.
The established benchmark: long track record, transparent objectives, documented scaling plan; $200K per-account ceiling before scaling.
Advertised maximums
Headline figures from the structured plan data for each firm. “Up to” splits and max funding are ceilings reached via tiers or scaling — not the figure every trader gets.
Our editorial scorecard (0–5)
| Dimension | Blueberry Funded | FTMO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing & value | 4.0 | 3.0 | Blueberry Funded |
| Profit split | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Payout speed | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Rules flexibility | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Transparency | 4.0 | 5.0 | FTMO |
Scores are The Prop Examiner’s editorial assessment, not user reviews. See our methodology.
Advertised vs verified
Blueberry Funded
FTMO
What actually binds you
Blueberry Funded
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Instant | Profit target | None |
| Single-phase | Profit target | 10% |
| Two-phase (P1/P2) | Profit target | 8% / 6% |
| Varies | Daily loss limit | 2%–5% (Instant Elite has none) |
| Evaluation | Max overall loss | 4%–10% static |
| Instant | Max overall loss | Trailing Lock |
| Varies | Minimum trading days | 3 days/phase or 5 days depending on plan |
| All | Consistency | None specified across listed plans |
| All | Prohibited styles | External signal/copy trading prohibited; Martingale & grid allowed |
FTMO
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Step | Profit target | 10% |
| 2-Step | Profit target | 10% (phase 1) + 5% (phase 2) |
| 1-Step | Daily loss limit | 3% |
| 2-Step | Daily loss limit | 5% |
| All | Max loss | 10% (1-Step uses end-of-day trailing) |
| 2-Step | Minimum trading days | 4 days |
Rules vary by product. For a plan-by-plan comparison, use the account comparison tool.
Balanced view
Blueberry Funded
Strengths
Cons & open risks
FTMO
Strengths
Cons & open risks
Our take
These two are closely matched — "better" depends on what you trade and the rules you can live within. Read each verdict, then verify the figures for your exact product before buying.
Blueberry Funded markets itself on a broker-backed model with a clear rule structure, low entry sizes, and flexible payout options. The main open questions are corporate transparency (founding/HQ) and the specific platforms behind the accounts.
FTMO is the established benchmark in this space: a long track record, transparent objectives, and a documented scaling plan. The main limitations are a $200K per-account ceiling before scaling and a 1-Step fee that is not refunded. We could not confirm live pricing without entering checkout, so price-shop on the day you buy.
Affiliate disclosure: The Prop Examiner is an independent project and may earn a commission if you sign up through some of our links. We are not affiliated with any firm reviewed. Trading challenges are simulated/educational products; no profits or payouts are guaranteed.
Common questions
Cited & dated
Figures trace to each firm’s own pages, accessed on the dates shown. Re-verify before relying on any number — pricing and promos change.
More head-to-heads