Loading The Prop Examiner research
Head-to-head · Independent comparison
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips
How Blueberry Funded and FundingPips stack up on profit split, pricing, payouts and the rules that bind a funded account — advertised claims separated from what we could verify.
Evidence desk · Independent analysisLast updated
Clear rules and flexible payouts; verify platform and corporate details.
Tiered split reaching 100% and a clear weekly payout rhythm; top tiers gated behind a consistency score.
On our five-dimension scorecard, FundingPips rates marginally higher overall — but the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below matters more than the average.
Advertised maximums
The numbers, head-to-head
Headline figures from the structured plan data for each firm. “Up to” splits and max funding are ceilings reached via tiers or scaling — not the figure every trader gets.
Profit split — headline maximum (%)
Higher is betterBlueberry Funded
90%
FundingPipsBest
100%
Entry price — lowest advertised ($)
Lower is betterBlueberry FundedBest
$145
FundingPips
$224
Max funding — headline ($)
Higher is betterBlueberry FundedBest
$200K
FundingPipsBest
$200K
Our editorial scorecard (0–5)
Who wins each dimension
| Dimension | Blueberry Funded | FundingPips | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing & value | 4.0 | 5.0 | FundingPips |
| Profit split | 4.0 | 5.0 | FundingPips |
| Payout speed | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Rules flexibility | 4.0 | 3.0 | Blueberry Funded |
| Transparency | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
Scores are The Prop Examiner’s editorial assessment, not user reviews. See our methodology.
Advertised vs verified
At a glance
Blueberry Funded
- Payout minimum & methods
- Minimum threshold and methods not on homepageverify before launch
FundingPips
What actually binds you
Key trading rules compared
Blueberry Funded
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Instant | Profit target | None |
| Single-phase | Profit target | 10% |
| Two-phase (P1/P2) | Profit target | 8% / 6% |
| Varies | Daily loss limit | 2%–5% (Instant Elite has none) |
| Evaluation | Max overall loss | 4%–10% static |
| Instant | Max overall loss | Trailing Lock |
| Varies | Minimum trading days | 3 days/phase or 5 days depending on plan |
| All | Consistency | None specified across listed plans |
| All | Prohibited styles | External signal/copy trading prohibited; Martingale & grid allowed |
FundingPips
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Step | Profit target | 10% |
| 2-Step | Profit target | 8% (phase 1) + 5% (phase 2) |
| 1-Step | Daily loss limit | 3% |
| 2-Step | Daily loss limit | 5% |
| 1-Step | Max drawdown | 6% static |
| 2-Step | Max drawdown | 10% |
| 1-Step | Minimum trading days | 3 days |
| Funded | Consistency | 35% consistency score for 90% tier / on-demand (cycles exempt) |
Rules vary by product. For a plan-by-plan comparison, use the account comparison tool.
Balanced view
Pros & cons
Blueberry Funded
Strengths
- Broker-backed model positioning, emphasised as a trust/execution differentiator.
- Very low entry sizes available ($1.25K Instant), useful for testing the product.
- Clear daily-loss/drawdown structure with static drawdown on evaluation plans.
- Flexible payout cadence (14-day default, 7-day and on-demand options).
- States no consistency rule on listed plans and permits Martingale/grid.
Cons & open risks
- Founding year, HQ, and legal entity are not disclosed on the homepage.
- Specific trading platform names are not detailed on the homepage.
- Crypto leverage is low (1:2), which may not suit some strategies.
- 'Trailing Lock' drawdown on instant accounts behaves differently from static drawdown.
- Promotional pricing (40% off) obscures the standard non-promo cost.
FundingPips
Strengths
- Tiered split can reach 100% on a monthly reward cycle.
- Flexible reward cadence (on-demand / weekly / biweekly / monthly).
- Weekly “Tuesday Pay Day” payout rhythm.
- Low advertised entry price (from $29 on 2-Step Pro).
Cons & open risks
- The 100% / 90% split tiers require meeting a 35% consistency score.
- Exact instrument count and platform list were not published on official pages.
- Site is Cloudflare-protected, making independent re-verification harder.
- As with all prop challenges, most buyers do not reach a payout.
Our take
Which should you choose?
FundingPips rates marginally higher on our scorecard, but "better" depends on what you trade and the rules you can live within. Read each verdict, then verify the figures for your exact product before buying.
Blueberry Funded markets itself on a broker-backed model with a clear rule structure, low entry sizes, and flexible payout options. The main open questions are corporate transparency (founding/HQ) and the specific platforms behind the accounts.
Visit Blueberry FundedWe may earn a commission. Any current discount is applied at checkout; confirm the total before paying.
FundingPips stands out for a tiered split that reaches 100% and a clear weekly payout rhythm, with a low entry price. The catch is that the top split tiers are gated behind a consistency score, and several details (instrument count, platform list, some targets) were not published on official pages. Compare the consistency requirement against your trading style before buying.
Visit FundingPipsWe may earn a commission. Any current discount is applied at checkout; confirm the total before paying.
Affiliate disclosure: The Prop Examiner is an independent project and may earn a commission if you sign up through some of our links. We are not affiliated with any firm reviewed. Trading challenges are simulated/educational products; no profits or payouts are guaranteed.
Common questions
Blueberry Funded vs FundingPips FAQ
- Is Blueberry Funded or FundingPips better?
- Our independent ratings: Blueberry Funded 3.6/5, FundingPips 4.1/5. FundingPips edges it on our scorecard, but the right pick depends on your market, budget and the rules you can trade within.
- Which is cheaper to start, Blueberry Funded or FundingPips?
- Lowest advertised entry price: Blueberry Funded from $145, FundingPips from $224. Blueberry Funded has the lower starting price, but compare like-for-like account sizes — cheapest is not always best value.
- Which has the higher profit split, Blueberry Funded or FundingPips?
- Headline ("up to") maximums: Blueberry Funded 90%, FundingPips 100%. FundingPips advertises the higher ceiling — but top splits are usually gated behind tiers or scaling, not what every trader gets.
- Does Blueberry Funded or FundingPips pay out faster?
- Blueberry Funded: 14-day cycle, with 7-day and on-demand options available. FundingPips: “Tuesday Pay Day” weekly; on-demand/weekly/biweekly/monthly selectable. Payout speed and eligibility depend on the product and on meeting each firm's rules; no payout is guaranteed.
Cited & dated
Sources
Figures trace to each firm’s own pages, accessed on the dates shown. Re-verify before relying on any number — pricing and promos change.
- 1.Blueberry Funded — homepage· accessed 2026-06-17
- 2.FundingPips — homepage· accessed 2026-06-17
- 3.FundingPips — trading objectives· accessed 2026-06-17
- 4.FundingPips — 1-step model· accessed 2026-06-17
- 5.FundingPips — rewards / Tuesday Pay Day· accessed 2026-06-17
More head-to-heads