Head-to-head · Independent comparison
How For Traders and The5ers stack up on profit split, pricing, payouts and the rules that bind a funded account — advertised claims separated from what we could verify.
Wide platform/instrument coverage and fast payouts, tempered by a short track record and limited rule disclosure up front.
Established firm with transparent High Stakes rules; a stricter 'profitable days' gate and MT5-only core product are the trade-offs.
On our five-dimension scorecard, The5ers rates marginally higher overall — but the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below matters more than the average.
Advertised maximums
Headline figures from the structured plan data for each firm. “Up to” splits and max funding are ceilings reached via tiers or scaling — not the figure every trader gets.
Our editorial scorecard (0–5)
| Dimension | For Traders | The5ers | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing & value | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Profit split | 4.0 | 5.0 | The5ers |
| Payout speed | 4.0 | 3.0 | For Traders |
| Rules flexibility | 4.0 | 3.0 | For Traders |
| Transparency | 2.0 | 4.0 | The5ers |
Scores are The Prop Examiner’s editorial assessment, not user reviews. See our methodology.
Advertised vs verified
For Traders
The5ers
What actually binds you
For Traders
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| One-Step | Profit target | 9% simulated profit |
| Two-step / Instant | Profit target | Not stated on homepageverify |
| All | Daily loss limit | Not stated on homepageverify |
| One-Step | Max overall loss | ~5% drawdown (type — trailing vs static — not stated)verify |
| All | Minimum trading days | Unlimited time to reach target; min days not statedverify |
| All | Consistency | Not stated on homepageverify |
| All | Prohibited styles | Not stated on homepage — see rules/terms pagesverify |
The5ers
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Profit target | 10% (Classic variant 8%) |
| Phase 2 | Profit target | 5% |
| All | Daily loss limit | 5% (from higher of prior day close or 00:00 balance) |
| All | Max overall loss | 10% from initial balance — static |
| All | Minimum trading days | 3 profitable days (closed positions netting ≥ +0.5%) |
| All | Inactivity | Accounts expire after 30+ consecutive days with no activity |
| All | Prohibited styles | Not detailed on pages reviewed — check full termsverify |
Rules vary by product. For a plan-by-plan comparison, use the account comparison tool.
Balanced view
For Traders
Strengths
Cons & open risks
The5ers
Strengths
Cons & open risks
Our take
The5ers rates marginally higher on our scorecard, but "better" depends on what you trade and the rules you can live within. Read each verdict, then verify the figures for your exact product before buying.
For Traders offers strong platform and instrument breadth, a fast-payout guarantee, and both evaluation and instant-funding routes. As a newer, offshore-registered firm it discloses less about daily-loss limits, drawdown type, and consistency rules on the homepage, so those need confirming. The Prop Examiner has no affiliate relationship with For Traders at this time.
The5ers is one of the more established names in the space, with a clearly documented High Stakes ruleset and a profit split that scales meaningfully for consistent traders. The 'profitable days' requirement and MT5-only core product are tradeoffs worth weighing, and a few payout specifics need confirming at checkout.
Affiliate disclosure: The Prop Examiner is an independent project and may earn a commission if you sign up through some of our links. We are not affiliated with any firm reviewed. Trading challenges are simulated/educational products; no profits or payouts are guaranteed.
Common questions
Cited & dated
Figures trace to each firm’s own pages, accessed on the dates shown. Re-verify before relying on any number — pricing and promos change.
More head-to-heads