Head-to-head · Independent comparison
How BrightFunded and FTMO stack up on profit split, pricing, payouts and the rules that bind a funded account — advertised claims separated from what we could verify.
Trader-friendly payout speed and no consistency rule, balanced against a young profile and unconfirmed founding/payout-minimum details.
The established benchmark: long track record, transparent objectives, documented scaling plan; $200K per-account ceiling before scaling.
On our five-dimension scorecard, FTMO rates marginally higher overall — but the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below matters more than the average.
Advertised maximums
Headline figures from the structured plan data for each firm. “Up to” splits and max funding are ceilings reached via tiers or scaling — not the figure every trader gets.
Our editorial scorecard (0–5)
| Dimension | BrightFunded | FTMO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing & value | 4.0 | 3.0 | BrightFunded |
| Profit split | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Payout speed | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Rules flexibility | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Transparency | 3.0 | 5.0 | FTMO |
Scores are The Prop Examiner’s editorial assessment, not user reviews. See our methodology.
Advertised vs verified
BrightFunded
FTMO
What actually binds you
BrightFunded
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Step Bright (P1/P2) | Profit target | 8% / 5% |
| 2-Step Classic (P1/P2) | Profit target | 10% / 5% |
| 1-Step | Profit target | 10% |
| 2-Step Bright | Daily loss limit | 4% |
| 2-Step Classic | Daily loss limit | 5% |
| 1-Step | Daily loss limit | 3% of original balance |
| 2-Step Bright | Max overall loss | 8% static |
| 2-Step Classic | Max overall loss | 10% static |
| 1-Step | Max overall loss | 6% trailing |
| All | Minimum trading days | 5 per stage |
| All | Consistency | No consistency rule advertised |
| All | Prohibited styles | Not detailed in the rules article — check full termsverify |
FTMO
| Phase / model | Rule | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Step | Profit target | 10% |
| 2-Step | Profit target | 10% (phase 1) + 5% (phase 2) |
| 1-Step | Daily loss limit | 3% |
| 2-Step | Daily loss limit | 5% |
| All | Max loss | 10% (1-Step uses end-of-day trailing) |
| 2-Step | Minimum trading days | 4 days |
Rules vary by product. For a plan-by-plan comparison, use the account comparison tool.
Balanced view
BrightFunded
Strengths
Cons & open risks
FTMO
Strengths
Cons & open risks
Our take
FTMO rates marginally higher on our scorecard, but "better" depends on what you trade and the rules you can live within. Read each verdict, then verify the figures for your exact product before buying.
BrightFunded leans on fast payouts, a no-consistency-rule structure, and a scaling profit split as its main draws, backed by a broad instrument range and multiple platforms. It appears relatively young and a few specifics (founding year, minimum payout, prohibited styles) were not confirmable from the pages reviewed.
FTMO is the established benchmark in this space: a long track record, transparent objectives, and a documented scaling plan. The main limitations are a $200K per-account ceiling before scaling and a 1-Step fee that is not refunded. We could not confirm live pricing without entering checkout, so price-shop on the day you buy.
Affiliate disclosure: The Prop Examiner is an independent project and may earn a commission if you sign up through some of our links. We are not affiliated with any firm reviewed. Trading challenges are simulated/educational products; no profits or payouts are guaranteed.
Common questions
Cited & dated
Figures trace to each firm’s own pages, accessed on the dates shown. Re-verify before relying on any number — pricing and promos change.
More head-to-heads